94. Pick 31 C.F.R. § 1604.9(d) (companies need provide same masters having partners and families of male teams so it will bring so you can partners and you may categories of women employees); cf. v. EEOC, 462 You.S. 669 (1983) (unlawful to exclude exposure of pregnancy away from guidelines accessible to partners out-of men professionals where company shielded all the scientific costs out-of spouses out-of feminine personnel).

95. 42 You.S.C. § 2000e(k). Getting a more comprehensive discussion of your own conditions of your PDA, see Conformity Instructions Section ___.

96. Look for, age.grams., Pallas v. Pacific Bell, 940 F.2d 1324 (9th Cir. 1991) (authorizing PDA claim during these affairs), cert. denied, 502 You.S. 1050 (1992); Carter v. Western Tel. and you can Tel. Co., 870 F. Supp. 1438 (S.D. Kansas 1994) (same), vacated by the consent, 1996 WL 656571 (S. (suite…)